Climbing out of the rabbit hole… I compare my National Resonator set-up with a traditional wooden biscuit vs. the new Revolution Biscuit…

Last week I posted a blog entry in which I compared video recordings of me playing my National Reso-rocket WB with the new Revolution Biscuit/Bridge, with and without the addition of a wooden gasket that sits between the biscuit and the resonator cone. The posting can be found here…

As I usually do, I shared my blog posting on my Facebook page, as well as a few other FB guitar enthusiast pages, including one dedicated to National Guitars users/fans. Sharing on Facebook gets my entries better exposure… in fact, people from all over the world have checked in to what I have to say and I am grateful for the time people take to read my articles and to comment on them.

My previous two articles about the Revolution biscuit received quite a bit of attention, but none more so than the most recent one. In fact there was quite a bit of consternation and dissatisfaction about how the guitar sounded with the Revolution biscuit, either with or without the wooden gasket. Someone suggested that the guitar strings may to too light… in fact, they’re quite heavy. There was even a bit of mysticism, one commenter suggesting that the installation of a Revolution Biscuit in a friend’s guitar removed its ghost, thus diminishing its sound quality. Another implied that perhaps my playing was at fault, which may be true, but I think the dominant variable was the Revolution Biscuit itself.

Reso-rocket WB, cone and biscuit removed…

I decided then that it might be useful to explore more closely a before and after comparison of the traditional wooden biscuit versus the Revolution biscuit. I had not done this before. The only other comparison that I am aware of that is publicly available is the one created by Steve James in his workshop, which you can find in this posting. It was hard for me to tell much difference between set-ups in James’s posting.

So, to respond to the sound critics I decided to do my own A/B comparison on the same exact guitar. I recorded myself playing first with the Revolution Biscuit (with wooden gasket deployed), then I disemboweled the guitar and reinstalled the original wooden biscuit and recorded the same tune again. The transition of one to the other was made easier because each biscuit was equipped with its own cone. If you’re interested in my recording technique you can find that information here. I recorded myself playing Muddy Waters’ tune I Feel Like Going Home, which I learned from Tom Feldmann’s excellent Guitar Workshop DVD. The guitar is tuned to Open G and I am using a heavy, solid brass Tone Dome slide.

Well… here are the two recordings:

First, the recording with the Revolution Biscuit installed:


Second, the recording with the tradition wooden biscuit re-installed on the guitar:


After completing the recordings and editing them a bit on my MacBook Pro with iMovie, I did some intense comparisons… I listened, comparing section by section of the tune, on my MacBook speakers, then through some nice Grado headphones, and finally piped it through my very nice Marantz/Paradigm sound system using Apple AirPlay. I also had my wife Annette and my Iowa-all-time-best-friend Grant listen to the recordings too and share their impressions with me.

In sum, everyone, including me liked the traditional wooden biscuit sound far more than the Revolution biscuit. The sonic and tonal differences were quite obvious. I am not particularly articulate when it comes down to discussing guitar tones, but I will try. The traditional wooden biscuit tones were more present, more naturally acoustic sounding, perhaps more resonator twangy sounding. The Revolution biscuit tones sounded more truncated, lacking tonal subtleties, and were flatter and more compressed sounding, with the compression increasing as the strings got heavier.

I’ve decided to climb out of the Revolution Biscuit rabbit hole and leave the wooden biscuit installed on my WB for the time being…

In conclusion:

  1. I was persuaded to try the Revolution Biscuit because it would allow me to improve my set-up in terms of playing action. My strings were a bit too high for comfortable finger-style playing. One of the key selling points of the Revolution Biscuit is the easy raising and lowering of the saddle using set screws to adjust the guitar’s action. Plus it was cool looking… I like the high-tech machined aluminum appearance of the new biscuit… To state the obvious, how a guitar looks is very important, but not near as important as it sounds…

  2. I did not expect a noticeable or negative tonal difference when replacing the wood biscuit, based largely on Steve James’s recording, but detected some immediate difference. Not doing an A/B comparison initially, I was not sure how much difference there really was and at that point I was too lazy to switch back and forth… it was a lot of somewhat stressful work setting up the Revolution biscuit the first time…

  3. Later, I accepted Steve James’s offer to try out the wooden gasket that sits between the Revolution Bridge and the cone mostly because I wanted to see if it would alter the tonal qualities in a positive way. There was some change in tone (positive I think) which I reported on earlier.

  4. In response to “sound critics” on Facebook, I finally did an A/B comparison of the two biscuits and as I perceive the results, the wooden biscuit is more natural sounding.

  5. Caveat: in another lifetime, I was a statistician (having minored in the subject) during my doctoral studies. My conclusions about the Revolution Biscuit are probably best applied for the National Reso-rocket WB… this was not an extensive factorial analysis… there may be other important variables at play such as saddle-type (i.e. wood) and guitar type (i.e. metal vs wood body or size) that may interact and cause noticeably different results!

Please let me know what you think…


Muddy Waters Style on Bottleneck Slide

Because of holiday travel it’s been a while since I posted on my blog… I actually have some longer blog ideas that I am percolating, but this morning I was inspired to write a relatively brief commentary about the artistry of Muddy Waters on bottleneck slide and how it influences my approach to playing.

National NRP B Resonator Guitar

The inspiration was a combination of me pulling out and practicing a Charlie Patton tune on my National NRP, a guitar that I’ve neglected for far too long, combined with stumbling across a Muddy Waters video I had posted on Facebook a year ago.

Before I go further, I must note that there are a many extraordinarily influential and skillful blues players that established the foundation for this marvelous genre; however, I personally do not believe there is anyone who matches, let alone, exceeds the importance of McKinley Morganfield, more commonly referred to as Muddy Waters (1913-1983).

Following you can see a great example of a Muddy Waters performance of the classic tune Honey Bee using bottleneck slide on an electric guitar and below the embed I will offer some observations about his style of play with a slide.

  • In the case of this video, Mr. Waters is playing an electric guitar. He owned an array of electrics and acoustics. In the case of this video I think he’s playing a Fender Telecaster, which he frequently favored. He can be seen playing slide on an array of acoustic and electric guitar in still images and videos; however, I cannot find any documentation that he played a resonator. I like to play slide on a National resonator because it’s set up to do so with high string action and it evokes the old classic Delta sound that I like.
  • Similar to Muddy Waters I like to keep the slide on my little finger because it frees up my other fingers up to fret the strings, which I find most natural. The ring finger is also a common place to wear a slide, but I never felt comfortable using it at that location. There are no hard fast rules where to place the slide. You can see people using a slide on the index finger too. Nevertheless, small and ring fingers are most common.
Left to right: nickel-coated brass, brass, long ceramic, short ceramic, long ebony wood
  • There are a variety of materials that can be used to slide across the strings of a guitar, examples from my collection can be seen in the above photograph. Commonly used slides can be metal, glass, ceramic, and even ebony wood, which Taylor Guitars recently brought onto the market. One of the earliest references to county blues slide playing indicated that the guitarist used a pocket knife as a slide. Accomplished slide player Duane Allman supposedly used a glass Coricidin pill bottle.
  • It appears in the Muddy Waters video that he’s using a short metal slide that resides above the middle knuckle of his little finger. The above knuckle location allows him to bend his small finger as much as 90 degrees to play the slide, which is exactly how I like to do it too. Other players cover the entire finger with the slide and must bend at the wrist to engage the slide, which I find very uncomfortable, so like Muddy I ride my slide above the middle knuckle of the little finger.
  • I like a metal slide too that is a bit on the small side so that it is not ungainly feeling when located above the middle knuckle of the small finger. The two “tone dome” metal slides shown above on the left are my favorites.
  • The occasional problem I find with the smallish slide is that some tunes call for a full across six string slide, which is pretty much impossible with a small slide, so on occasion when I play a six string slide tune like Charlie Patton’s Spoonful I will use the longer ceramic slide that I own. Sometimes I will use the longer wood slide but it creates a somewhat undesirable muted sound.
  • Finally, it is difficult for me to observe from the video how tightly Muddy Waters likes the fit of the slide on his small finger. Personally, I favor a relatively firm fit, so that if I hold my finger down toward the floor the slide will not drop off my finger from gravitational pull. Other players don’t seem to mind a loose fit, but not me. Because my fingers are relatively small, I must do some alteration to the interior of the slide to “tighten” it up, and as can be seen in the photograph above I like to line the interior of the slide with a nice “grippy” moleskin that adheres with pressure sensitive adhesive. A good pair of tweezers will help do the job.
I usually play the Tone Dome backwards to get more string to string coverage…